“Re-create it in the aggregate” is one of the great lines of dialogue about art’s favorite hero, the underdog. Culture is full of underdog stories, but Moneyball (2011), now available on 4K, is the rare entry about what happens next. Through real-life A’s manager Billy Beane, it explores the divide between the reality of winning and internalizing that you’re not a loser. Is the enemy of the underdog the overdog, or is the real enemy of the underdog the cage of the mind? What restricts us from living a truly free life?
The antagonists of Moneyball are numerous — the tyranny of success metrics and indicators, reputation as a weapon of oppression by “the man,” and the treatment of workers as disposable resources. A lifetime of ruthlessly compromising your own ideals yet still coming up short. The film becomes a critique of capitalism that offers no alternatives, instead capturing the frustration and resignation of doing the most with what you have and waiting for the system collapse we all expect. It’s the second-best thing Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network; A Few Good Men) ever wrote, potentially because he is adapting a similar figure in neo-liberal centrist politics, Michael Lewis.
“You get on base, we win. You don’t, we lose. And I hate losing, Chavy. I hate it. I hate losing more than I even wanna win. And there’s a difference.”
Lewis and Sorkin are both intellectual magpies whose fame has only worsened their publicly personal struggles with self and class awareness. Where Aaron Sorkin once wrote The Social Network (2010), Lewis once wrote the book The Big Short (2010). Two elite-skewering works reacting very literally to the 2008 financial crisis and the economic violence of the Bush era.
Fast forward to the 2020s and Aaron Sorkin embarrasses himself beyond human comprehension by writing a New York Times Op-ed declaring that the Democratic Party should nominate Republican Senator Mitt Romney for President. This was mere hours before Joe Biden endorsed Kamala Harris. And Lewis wrote a book and conducted a whole press tour defending Crypto criminal Sam Bankman Fried as if he was a child being punished for something he didn’t do. Both turns are away from Truth itself and towards a world where power and money are wielded without giving proper weight to the consequences, the antithesis of their early works.
And yet, in Moneyball, their voices are supplanted by the magic of cinema itself. Because, while yes, an auteur’s voice can mark or shape a film, every film is also the authored work of all who contribute to it. Authorship created in the aggregate. In fact, I have heard people ask “Moneyball, is that actually good?” because of director Bennet Miller’s career being marred by the divisive reactions to Foxcatcher (2014) and his low output. But auteur theory has its limits. Cashiers du Cinema (XX) may have coined the term “auteur” to describe the fingerprints that aged directors left on their studio films in retrospect, but they also coined the term “direct cinema,” or “cinema without a master.” If a film’s author is a director, then he is unique among authors because his expression comes to us echoed through every camera grip and screenwriter and costumer. Even the most singular vision is derived from myriad translations at this scale, and it’s safe to say, in hindsight, this is a film made by a crew that knew how to get on base.
“People are overlooked for a variety of biased reasons and perceived flaws.”
There is a brief and oft-memed montage in the film set to “The Mighty Rio Grande” by This Will Destroy You. I watch it all the time. The cell phone is often discussed as the cinematic challenge of our time, but it’s not. Data is. The average individual and cinema itself are still struggling to reckon with the impact that invisible numbers have on our lives when wielded by capital. Miller shows us one way: point the camera at the monitor, show us the pixels, drive home that people are looking at the data and making decisions about your life, and whether or not you deserve a better one. Brad Pitt’s (Fight Club; Babylon) Billy Beane is such a compelling character because he and his decisions embody the sliding door of data. It can be used, like in this montage, to show that a world ruled by judgment is a world run by prejudice and complacency. Data can allow us to cut through the fog and see what’s really happening. And in the many firings and transfers Billy Beane ruthlessly enacts in pursuit of sticking it to the man, we also see that a world ruled by data is one where we are robbed of our worth.
There are big actors in Moneyball. Brad Pitt gives his best performance alongside steady hands Jonah Hill (This Is the End) and Philp Seymour Hoffman (Twister; Punch Drunk Love). They’re surrounded by character actors like Stephen Bishop (The Town) and Brent Jennings (Witness) singing backup in the exact right key. But it’s Kerris Dorsey (Walk the Line) who makes me weep, and it’s Casey Bond’s (Greyhound) Chad Bradford whose face I see when I dream of the possibilities of montage.
The only reason to purchase the 4K UHD release of Moneyball is the color. The special features are essentially the same as the Blu-ray release, and the image is just as sharp between the two. The black levels also aren’t very different, but in the blue and reds, you can see a strong difference, especially for the return viewer.
I watch chunks of Moneyball (2011) so frequently that I stopped logging it on Letterboxd. Last year, when I was burnt-out, I spent a few weeks driving around to the score. I jokingly call it “divorced man cinema” (despite not being one) because, at the end of the day, it’s a film about your ex-wife telling you “good job,” and your daughter saying “I love you.” It’s a totemic film not just among sports movies but drama filmmaking in the 2010s.
The Big Short is an important book about the 2008 financial crisis, and the film adaptation is pretty good, pushing the fourth wall forward in ways that still reverberate today. While there are scenes in that film that last for posterity, such as Steve Carell’s (Foxcatcher) Mark Baum’s discussion with Max Greenfield’s (The Neighborhood) mortgage broker, Moneyball is the movie I personally will point youth to and say “This is what it was like,” because even when Billy Beane changed the game, the people with all the money borrowed his homework and changed it back. This is the limit of reformation. That’s Moneyball.
Available on 4K UHD Blu-ray and digital May 12th, 2026.
For more information, head to the official Sony Pictures Home Entertainment Moneyball webpage.
Share this:
Categories: Films To Watch, Home Release, Recommendation
Leave a Reply